close
Warning:
Can't synchronize with repository "(default)" ("(default)" is not readable or not a Git repository.). Look in the Trac log for more information.
- Timestamp:
-
Jun 27, 2017, 3:41:29 AM (7 years ago)
- Author:
-
Clarence Wret
- Comment:
-
--
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
v6
|
v7
|
|
30 | 30 | * Use different data-sets (W < 1.4, W < 2.0, ANL only, BNL only) |
31 | 31 | * Use kitchen-sink data including the kinematic distributions in shape only |
| 32 | |
| 33 | ---- |
| 34 | Patrick suggestions: |
| 35 | 1. ANL/BNL CC1pip W < 1.4 GeV : Enu+Q2 : MaRES+CA5 (already done, this is the NuFact fit) |
| 36 | 2. ANL/BNL CC1pip W < 2.0 GeV : Enu+Q2: MaRES+CA5 |
| 37 | 3. ANL/BNL All Channels W < 2.0 GeV : Enu+Q2 : MaRES+CA5 |
| 38 | 4. ANL/BNL All Channels W < 2.0 GeV : Enu + Q2 : MaRES + CA5 + I1/2 |
| 39 | 5. ANL/BNL All Channels W < 2.0 GeV : All datasets (minuts phi and adler) : MaRES + CA5 + I1/2 |
| 40 | |
| 41 | Clarence would add in doing a ANL W < 1.4 GeV only, including all distributions. Possibly add in the BNL W < 1.4 GeV too but only available for CC1pi+1p. |
| 42 | |
| 43 | Also demonstrate the impact of choosing the BNL flux? |
| 44 | |
| 45 | Maybe add in GGM? |
| 46 | |
| 47 | Then try MiniBooNE 2D cosmu pmu |