close
Warning:
Can't synchronize with repository "(default)" ("(default)" is not readable or not a Git repository.). Look in the Trac log for more information.
- Timestamp:
-
Sep 4, 2016, 5:15:13 PM (8 years ago)
- Author:
-
Clarence Wret
- Comment:
-
--
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
|
v35
|
v36
|
|
| 26 | 26 | == BNL == |
| 27 | 27 | |
| 28 | | * Note: I've found the BNL flux is not easy to come by. It is documented in three places; one of which is for a different detector (scintillator), one of which is determined from fitting MA CCQE events, one of which is repeats the CCQE fit with the full dataset. The latest simulation was presented at NuInt02 but was never made public other than in the proceedings. The NuInt02 website is offline, but I got my copy through a colleauge at KEK |
| | 28 | * I've found the BNL flux hard to come by. It is documented in three places; one of which is for a different detector (scintillator), one of which is determined from fitting MA CCQE events for the data-set up to 1981, another which repeats the CCQE fit with the full dataset. The latter was presented at NuInt02 but was never made public in other than the proceedings. The NuInt02 website is nowadays offline: I got my copy through a colleauge at KEK. Interestingly, the proceedings were to be published in Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.), which I have been unable to find. |
| 29 | 29 | |
| 30 | 30 | ==== Neutrino mode ==== |
| | 31 | |
| 31 | 32 | * L.A. Ahrens et al, ''Determination of the neutrino fluxes in the Brookhaven wide-band beams'', Physical Review D, Volume 34, Number 1, 1 July 1986 |
| 32 | 33 | * This uses a dedicated "flux measuring detector" placed in the AGS. It has different radial extent to the original bubble chamber, so shouldn't be used for the bubble chamber flux. However, the paper claims good data-simulation agreement, which adds credibility to the bubble chamber flux. |
