nuisance is hosted by Hepforge, IPPP Durham
close Warning: Can't synchronize with repository "(default)" ("(default)" is not readable or not a Git repository.). Look in the Trac log for more information.

Changes between Version 100 and Version 101 of ExperimentFlux


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 6, 2016, 11:24:47 PM (8 years ago)
Author:
Clarence Wret
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • ExperimentFlux

    v100 v101  
    257257 * MINERvA consistently list fluxes in publications. Sometimes in the paper itself, sometimes in appendices/additionals on arxiv.
    258258
    259  * Absolute flux prediction over range 1.5 - 10 GeV Enu
     259 * Absolute flux prediction over range 1.5 - 10 GeV Enu:
    260260 [[Image(MINERvA_neutrino_fluxes.png,600px,center)]]
    261261
    262  * Shape comparison over total range of each flux (some go from 0-10 GeV, others from 1.5-10 GeV, others from 2-6 GeV, so this comparison is not entirely fair!)
     262 * Shape comparison over '''total range of each flux'''. Some fluxes go from 0-10 GeV, others from 1.5-10 GeV, others from 2-6 GeV, so each flux '''is not area normalised over the same range'''; each flux is area normalised to their integral over the entire range in which they are given
    263263 [[Image(MINERvA_neutrino_fluxes_shape.png,600px,center)]]
    264264
    265  * Shape comparison over limited range of each flux which is always filled (2-6 GeV): this shows all the published fluxes have very similar shape '''and can be used interchangibly'''
     265 * Shape comparison over restricted range which is published for all fluxes (2-6 GeV). This shows all the published fluxes have very similar shape indeed '''and can be used interchangibly'''
    266266
    267267 * The finest binned option is attachment:MINERvA_numuFHC_nu_2016_flux.root​
    268268 [[Image(MINERvA_neutrino_fluxes_shape_same_range.png,600px,center)]]
    269269
    270  * '''Note:''' MINERvA modified the flux after neutrino-electron scattering was measured. It is clear from above that this was mostly a normalisation correction. However, this also means that '''early MINERvA cross-section data should move its central value by ~11%'''
     270 * '''Note:''' MINERvA modified the flux after neutrino-electron scattering was measured. It is clear from above that this was mostly a normalisation correction and does not matter for MC generating. However, this does mean that '''early MINERvA cross-section data should move its central value by ~11%'''
    271271
    272272